Powered By Blogger

Sunday, June 28, 2026

 Celebrating the Fourth

          As we celebrate American Independence, it is appropriate to reflect upon the foundations of our liberty that the American Founding--especially the Founders' Declaration of Independence and Constitution--have encouraged.  Neither the Declaration nor the American Constitution were accidents; both were rooted in an inherited worldview and an understanding of human nature that is of continuing importance to Americans today. 

          For the Founders, human nature was defined by its social character, grounded in community, and devoted to encouraging the unfolding of the moral life, so as to enlighten and develop civilization.  With the insights of the classical world, Judaism and Christianity under their proverbial belts, the Founders understood human life as essentially social.  Moral and spiritual development required interaction and restraint that were most acutely experienced in one's community and in society.  In other words, the ethical life could not be sustained outside of a social framework.  While not rejecting a role for self-interest within the community, the Founders recognized a tension between need for some degree of societal unity and the needs of the individual.  They suggested that the properly constituted society could assist in lessening selfishness associated with our "brute creation," and encouraged attachment to the common good as an alternative.  Authentic social life required self-denial in some form, regardless of the level of enmity between individuals and the groups that made up society, as humans were naturally drawn to each other.

          The Founders also realized that humans were not perfect, so an element of restraint was necessary within society and politics.   They rejected the radical individualism often associated with social contract thinkers like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau.  To envision humankind as naturally good was unacceptable.  The Founders' defense of an authentic, moral community was based upon acknowledging that the only natural state was the political and social one to which an actual person was born.  Instead of being born free, humans were born subject to parental authority and the laws of the country of their birth.

          If the country were to survive, the Founders believed a stable mode of popular rule--or citizen involvement--had to be established, and the community must be protected against efforts to incorporate its stake in society and politics into a political structure that would diminish the various communities' and states' most important qualities.  The preserving and protecting of an organic, "republican" system of popular rule required accepting the natural diversity of the communities and states that formed the larger society and government, while enjoying the increased liberties that resulted from this dividing of political authority.  Today, we call this division federalism.

          Having a political system based on the relative autonomy of local communities and the division of political authority was a great accomplishment, but it needed an anchor.  The Founders provided such a guide with the American Constitution.  The Constitution is more than a written document, it is a collection of customs, charters, traditions and habits of the American people.  The aim of the Constitution was to provide for a high degree of political harmony, so that liberty might be maintained through the centuries. 

          We have been able to preserve social and political liberty because our Constitution provides explicit constraints upon the centralization of political power.  As citizens, we are assured that the laws will not change from year to year.  The Constitution allows Americans to find some comfort in the fact that if they accept certain restraints, they will experience a great deal of political liberty.  Our Constitution divides political power between the national and state governments, as well as between the branches of the national government.  This protects citizens, communities, and states from the arbitrary and unjust actions by individuals who have assumed temporary control of the government.  The American Constitution also makes those who govern accountable to those who elected them. 

Today we constantly hear proposals from the Trump Administration to expand presidential powers on one hand, while on the other, Congress, the “peoples’ branch,” also seems destined to increase the size and scope of the federal government.  Unfortunately, such ideas neglect the great accomplishment of American politics--the diffusion of political power and the limits upon the authority of government.  Our continued success is dependent upon a recovery of our appreciation of liberty, the original division of power, and the renewal of personal responsibility for perpetuating the regime.  Efforts at revolutionizing our understanding of liberty and political authority only undermine our political order.  Our great country can survive, and prosper, if we can refrain from being distracted by our current circumstances, and remember our duties as American citizens.


Dr. H. Lee Cheek, Jr., is Dean Emeritus and Professor of Political Science at East Georgia State College, now part of Georgia Southern University.

Friday, April 11, 2025

"Lost Causes," A Lenten Devotion

 Fourth Sunday of Lent Devotional                     Rev. Lee Cheek

 

Old Testament: Joshua 5:9-12

Epistle: 2 Corinthians 5:16-21

Gospel: Luke 15:1-3, 11b-32

 

Lost Causes

 

                The great poet T. S. Eliot once suggested there were no “lost causes.”  The statement is rather peculiar when first encountered, as all of us can think of family, friends, places, and the like, that we would like to avoid or at least forget.  We also do not have to look around too closely to see “lost causes.”  A friend of mine inherited an old wool cloak from his grandfather, a once fancy piece of clothing he would wear at formal events.  When asked why he adored the old piece of clothing, my friend responded “this coat has outlived the Russian czar, the Hapsburg Empire, and the Ottoman Empire”—all “lost causes.”  Like my friend’s example, we have to consider that some “lost causes” are not really lost at all. 

 

                More importantly, many of us have considered ourselves lost causes to some degree.  The Parable of the Prodigal Son teaches us that no one is beyond the possibility of  Divine forgiveness, redemption, and external life with God.   

 

                As a young minister over thirty years ago in North Carolina, I faced a challenge I could not resolve.  My communion steward, an elderly lady and vital part of the church, asked me to visit her son, Jerry, and she later informed me that he was a very serious alcoholic, but still living with his wife and three children across the street from the church.  Jerry, in fact, was  a proverbial “stone’s throw” from my office, but I had never encountered him.  I called Jerry, but could not contact him by phone.  I left notes on his door, and in his mailbox, all to no avail.  Community and church members who noticed me attempting to visit Jerry suggested I would not be able to reach him, as he had lost his job as a computer programmer a decade earlier, and had even been removed from his post as the local Kiwanis president because of his addiction and troubling behavior.  Jerry’s uncle informed me that Jerry’s shadow had not darkened the church door in a quarter century.  He was a true “lost cause” in the estimation of those closest to him, except his faithful mother, and God.

 

A few days later, I saw some teenagers playing badminton in his yard and recognized these folks as Jerry’s children.  I walked over to them and asked if Jerry was home, and the children told me he was asleep.   I introduced myself, and the eldest of the children told me he would take me to his father.  As we approached the house, the children, and Jerry’s wife, began disparaging their father and husband, as I was escorted into the family’s living room and finally meeting Jerry.  We met for a few minutes and scheduled a time to have a cup of coffee together.  He was a troubled but kind man.  We met weekly for a month or so, and I asked Jerry if would accompany me to an AA meeting.  He agreed, and Jerry became a regular attendee, and even returned to church, and eventually to the church choir.  Over the next year, the church community accepted Jerry back into the fold in a very Christlike manner.  He experienced the renewal of his faith and his most important commitments to family.  Jerry had neglected and damaged his relations with many people due to his substance abuse, but slowly, and with God’s help, he experienced personal and Divine forgiveness.  With the help of a loving God and a redemptive community, Jerry who was once a “lost cause,” became a gained cause, and a vital part of the community of faith. 

 

Text Notes and Questions for Discussion

 

I.  Luke 15 is one of the most famous chapters of scripture in the Bible, and a beautiful teaching about the joy of God when His children return to His fold.  In Luke 15 we find three parables (“Lost Sheep,” 15:3-7; “Lost Coin,” 15:8-10; and “Prodigal Son,” 15:11-32).

 

15:1-2                 The Sinners Come Together

15: 11 and 12 Two sons and the sharing of property

15:13                  “reckless” living

15:14                  The two disasters

15:15                  Swine Challenge

15.16                  Thief?

15:17-19           Disillusionment

15:20-26           Central Issue

15:27-32           Conclusion

 

 

Thursday, June 13, 2024

Totalitarianism Reconsidered

 


CHOICE

www.choice360.org

Social & Behavioral Sciences
Political Science - Political Theory

62-0242
JC480
MARC
Forti, Simona. Totalitarianism: a borderline idea in political philosophy, tr. by Simone Ghelli. Stanford, 2023. 182p bibl index ISBN 9781503627505, $100.00; ISBN 9781503637375 pbk, $25.00; ISBN 9781503637382 ebook, contact publisher for price.
Integrating the insights of political theory and contemporary politics, Forti (Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy) offers a timely analysis of the “evolving” concept of totalitarianism in theory and practice. The book is a survey of how “reflection on totalitarianism ushered in a new, unprecedented way of thinking [about] power” (p. 145). Forti provides a convincing overview of the emergence of “one of the most significant and stormy debates in contemporary political theory and philosophy” (p. 4), which advances the standard depiction of the concept as the comparison between Nazism and Stalinism. In a succinct manner, Forti outlines the development of totalitarianism from the origins of the notion in the works of Amendola, Gramsci, and Schmitt, among others, through subsequent understandings. With clarity, she critiques the critics of totalitarianism, especially the work of Eric Voegelin and the central role of Hannah Arendt's scholarship. The book’s final chapter and conclusion take the form of a convincing plea for the continued assessment of totalitarianism's dangers and the many forms of the idea. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Graduate students, faculty, and general readers. -- H. L. Cheek Jr., emeritus, East Georgia State College

Choice Vol. 62, Issue 1
Sept 2024

Sunday, November 26, 2023

Understanding Democracy

 



With the increased public and scholarly interest in the meaning and endurance of democracy, this tome by Jason Brennan (Georgetown) provides a lucid and accessible introduction to the concept.  The older, negative assessments (for example, Plato) of democracy to the modern defenders of the centrality of democracy as the “best form of government” are chronicled with care, and in a manner that will appeal to a wide readership (p. 1).  The author offers a “sixth grade model of democracy” to provide a “basic model of how democracy works” (p. 6).  Five core democratic values are explicated to provide for a greater understanding of the concept, including stability, virtue, wisdom, liberty, and equality.  Two chapters are devoted to each democratic value, with a chapter affirming each core value, followed by a closely related chapter that is “skeptical and critical” of the value.  At the end of each chapter a clear and lucid summary is provide.  The treatment of virtue (chaps. 3 and 4) and liberty (chaps. 8 and 9) as democratic values, and as part of democratic theory, also make a significant contribution to the understanding of democracy in practice.                                               

Tuesday, September 20, 2022

New History of the Democratic Party


 

Hilton, Adam. True Blues: The Contentious Transformation of the Democratic Party. Pennsylvania, 2021. 280p bibl index ISBN 9780812252996, $55.00; ISBN 9780812297966.

In this imaginative, lively book on the history of the Democratic Party, Hilton (Mount Holyoke College) offers a challenge to existing scholarship on the evolution of the Democratic Party since the end of the New Deal. Instead of affirming the role of party leaders and officeholders as the main force in shaping the party’s direction, this book argues that "conflict between extra-party groups" (p. 2) controlled political changes. Over time, a different type of political party was created—an advocacy party—that diminished older sources of political authority. The advocacy party is the result of several developments: the rise of political entrepreneurs, reform movements that sought to overcome the limitations of the old party structure, and persistent conflict among factions to define the party’s focus and electoral strategies. The second half of the book provides exemplary case studies of group activity related to the overall theme of the volume. This study allows for a greater understanding of the change that has taken and continues to take place in the Democratic Party.

--H. L. Cheek Jr., East Georgia State College

(Forthcoming, Choice, November 2022, Vol. 60 No. 3)